THE LIBERATION INITIATIVE · MODERN TEST DATA MANAGEMENT

Test data management that serves every team, not just developers

Developers, testers, analysts and AI teams each need production-shaped data. Mage Data delivers it masked and fit for purpose, in minutes, through the route your teams already use.

LIVE NOW
Provisioning
Minutes
not weeks
Storage
Up to90%
less storage
Coverage
100+
integrations, 28 native connectors
Protection
80+
masking techniques

Customer Recognition

Highest Rated
Gartner Peer Insights Anonymous Customer Reviews
Data Masking and Synthesis
Test Data Management

Highest-ranked platform over the past 12 months

Highly rated by Analysts

Gartner

Market Overview: Data Security Platforms

Q4-2026

Gartner

Market Overview: Data Masking and Synthesis

Q3-2026

Forrester

The Data Security Platforms Landscape

Q3-2026

KuppingerCole

Leader

Leadership Compass: Data Security Platforms

Q4-2026

Bloor

Champion

Test Data Management

Q2-2025

OVERVIEW

What is Modern TDM?

Modern TDM (test data management) finds the sensitive data in production, protects it with the right method for each use, and delivers it to every team that needs it, from developers and testers to analysts, AI pipelines and partners. It all runs under one policy, through the routes your teams already use. The one-minute video shows what data friction costs and how Modern TDM removes the wait.

Test Data Management in one minute
Video coming soon

Test Data Management in one minute

THE PROBLEM

The real bottleneck is data friction

Test data management used to serve one team: developers testing code. Today the same production-shaped data is wanted by testers, analysts, AI and machine learning teams, and outside partners. Most requests still go through the same route: a ticket, a DBA, a full copy, a wait.

Legacy tools made test data safe. Making it fast, and useful to every team that now asks for it, is the harder part.

What Data Friction Costs You

Weeks in the queue

Every request waits on a ticket and a DBA

Copies already stale

Data starts ageing the day it's cloned

One shape for everyone

A single masked copy serves teams with very different needs

Real data waiting to be masked

A fresh clone can sit unmasked until the masking job runs

THE EVOLUTION OF TEST DATA MANAGEMENT

Five phases, five mechanisms, all still in use

Each phase answered the constraint of its time. The constraints kept changing; the mechanisms stayed.

  1. Through the mid-1990s

    Phase 1: Clone and subset

    Test data meant a full restore of production. Subsetting carved out a smaller, referentially intact slice for testers.

    Adds

    • Subsetting
  2. Late 1990s to 2000s

    Phase 2: Mask the copy

    HIPAA, GLBA, SOX and PCI DSS made real records in test indefensible, so static masking became a scheduled batch job.

    Adds

    • In-place static masking
  3. Late 2000s to 2010s

    Phase 3: Extract, mask, load

    Some systems couldn't be masked where they sat, so masking moved into the pipeline.

    Adds

    • Pipeline masking
  4. 2010s

    Phase 4: Self-service and virtualization

    Agile and DevOps broke the shared environment. Pipelines went any-to-any, and virtual copies came from one masked snapshot in minutes.

    Adds

    • In-flight masking
    • Virtual copies
  5. 2020s

    Phase 5: Continuous and fit-for-purpose

    GDPR made consistent masking across platforms essential and moved discovery upstream. Requests diversified.

    Adds

    • Masked CDC Roadmap
    • Purpose-specific delivery

Modern test data management is what you get when all five work together, under one policy.

At a glance: what changes as test data management grows up

Legacy approaches still have their place. Modern test data management expands what they can do.

Dimension Legacy approach Modern TDM
Getting data Legacy approachA ticket to a DBA, then a wait of weeks Modern TDMVirtual copies in minutes, masked pipelines, or a request in natural language
Who it serves Legacy approachMainly developers Modern TDMDevelopers, testers, analysts, AI and ML teams, third parties
Shape of data Legacy approachOne masked copy for every team Modern TDMThe shape each team needs: masked, subsetted or fully synthetic
When masking happens Legacy approachAfter the copy lands Modern TDMIn transit, or when the master snapshot is created
How data moves Legacy approachOne route Modern TDMIn-database masking, Extract-Mask-Load, file gateways, virtual copies, on demand through natural language or REST APIs
Policy Legacy approachSet per environment Modern TDMOne policy, enforced across every mechanism

THE MAGE DATA DIFFERENCE

One policy, every team, every delivery style

Moving to modern test data management isn't about swapping one masking tool for another. It's about giving every team the right shape of data, under one policy, through the routes they already use.

  • Sensitive Data Discovery & Classification

    Finds sensitive data in columns, free text and files, and keeps finding it as schemas change.

  • Static Data Masking

    Irreversible masking in place, with the method chosen per field: redacted for a performance test, realistic for app testing.

  • Intelligent Subsetting

    Name one condition, like customers over 60, and every related record comes with it.

  • Database Virtualization

    Virtual copies in minutes from one masked snapshot. Every copy is born compliant.

  • Secure Data Provisioning

    Masked as it moves, from any source to any target, so data never lands unmasked.

  • File Masking & Secure File Gateways

    Files dropped in cloud storage or a folder are found, masked and forwarded automatically.

  • Synthetic Data

    Realistic data generated from a schema or production samples, for greenfield development, edge cases and model training, inside your own environment.

  • Training Data Guardrails

    Protects sensitive data before it trains, fine-tunes, evaluates or tests a model, with model quality preserved.

Modern test data management isn't another tool to bolt on. Test data management is one part of the Mage Data Security Platform, built around the four things every organization must do to comply with any privacy law: know your data, eliminate unnecessary data, control access and automate compliance.

The same discovery layer that finds sensitive data for testing also drives masking and monitoring controls in production, with pre-built policies for GDPR, HIPAA, PCI DSS and a dozen regional frameworks. Built on two decades of data security.

  • One classification exercise.
  • One policy model.
  • One procurement.

LIBERATION INITIATIVE

Switching, one workload at a time

Mage Data runs alongside your current tool, so nothing stops while you move.

  1. Step 1: Policy migration.

    Bring your existing masking rules and classifications across, rather than rebuilding them.

  2. Step 2: Side-by-side validation.

    Run both on the same data and compare the output before anything is switched off.

  3. Step 3: A delivery path that fits.

    Keep the tickets, pipelines and schedules your teams already use.

FAQs

Frequently asked questions

Test data management is the practice of finding sensitive data, protecting it, and delivering realistic, referentially intact copies to the teams and systems that build and test software. It used to serve developers alone. The same production-shaped data now feeds testers, performance engineers, analysts, AI and machine learning pipelines, third-party processors and auditors, and each needs a different shape of it.

Masking is one technique inside test data management. Masking changes sensitive values so they cannot identify anyone. Test data management covers the whole lifecycle: finding where sensitive data lives, deciding how each classification should be protected, and delivering the result through subsetting, pipelines, file gateways or virtual copies. A masking tool without discovery only protects the fields somebody already knew about.

Minutes, not weeks. The delay in most organizations is not the copy itself but the queue in front of it: a ticket, a DBA, a clone, then a masking job. Where virtual copies are served from an already-masked snapshot, provisioning is a matter of minutes and does not consume a full copy of storage. The number worth measuring is request to usable environment, not how long the job runs.

Through database virtualization. Many writable copies share one masked golden snapshot plus their own changes, which cuts non-production storage by up to 90% and brings provisioning down from days to minutes. Masking is applied when the snapshot is created, not after a clone exists, so every copy served from it is protected on arrival and there is no window in which real data sits in a non-production environment.

Yes. Discovery is patented and score-based, and it reads free-text and unstructured content as well as structured sources, combining dictionary and pattern matching with validation, data matching, and model-based analysis. This matters because the sensitive values that cause problems are usually the ones nobody labeled — an account number pasted into a support note, an identifier in a repurposed column.

It depends on whether protection is fit for purpose or applied uniformly. Blanket redaction destroys format, distribution and consistency, and will break a test suite. Fit-for-purpose protection selects a method per data element: format-preserving encryption keeps an identifier's shape so joins resolve, generalization turns a date of birth into an age band so the statistical signal survives, and deterministic masking means the same customer looks the same in every system.

Four delivery mechanisms plus virtualization, all running from a single policy definition: in-place masking of an existing copy, extract-mask-load pipelines with protection applied in transit, secure file gateways that mask files as they land in object storage, self-service provisioning, and writable virtual copies. Adding a mechanism later does not mean rebuilding the policies.

Yes, and the obligations are specific. PCI DSS v4.0.1 Requirement 6.5.5 bars live primary account numbers from pre-production environments unless those environments are in the cardholder data environment and protected accordingly. HIPAA sets a de-identification standard under 45 CFR 164.514(b). Under GDPR, pseudonymized data that can still be attributed to a person remains personal data. What all three reward is protection applied before the copy exists, and a record that shows it.

Training and evaluation sets are copies of production like any other, and they tend to be the least governed because engineering creates them rather than a business process. The control point is extraction, before the data reaches the pipeline, because a model cannot be made to unlearn what it was trained on without retraining. Treat an AI training set as another consumer of test data, governed by the same policy.

28 native connectors supporting more than 100 integrations across databases, data warehouses, file stores, analytics platforms and workstations, with accelerators for Oracle ERP, SAP, Snowflake and BigQuery. Deployment is on-premises, cloud or hybrid.

Yes. Mage Data delivers test data through the routes your teams already use: in place, in transit, as virtual copies, or through file drops. You can move one workload at a time while your current tool keeps running.

They come with you. Policy migration brings your existing masking rules and classifications across, and side-by-side validation lets you compare the output on the same data before anything is switched off.

RESOURCES

Everything on test data management

You're not stuck with the TDM tool you bought a decade ago

The tools that made test data safe were never built to make it fast, or to serve analysts and AI teams who weren't in the room when you chose them. Policy migration and side-by-side validation keep the move low-risk.

Thirty minutes. Discovery, masking and delivery working together on data shaped like yours.

Part of the Liberation Initiative